I promised I wouldn’t but I just gave it a name. :) Actually, it’s based on a tweet from Marie Haynes saying, “It’s March Madness!” after I posted screenshots of the wild tremor starting on 3/14/18. More about that tremor soon.

As many of you know, Google pushed a really big update starting the week of March 5, 2018 (with Google now confirming it started rolling out on March 7, 2018). Many sites saw impact on 3/9, but I started seeing impact before that date (internationally). I received the first calls and messages about major volatility on 3/8, and when digging into those sites, you could clearly see the jumps or drops starting on 3/8 and 3/9.

I started sharing screenshots of what I was seeing that weekend and then we received confirmation from Google’s Danny Sullivan that there was a big update.

First my tweet from 3/10:

And here is the confirmation from Danny on 3/12:

By the way, I love the transparency that Danny is bringing to site owners via the @searchliaison Twitter account. If you aren’t following that account yet, you should. We typically don’t receive confirmation from Google about major updates, so it was great to hear that from Danny. Also, he explained more about what he called “broad updates” that focus on quality versus “focused updates” that occur all the time. Anyone focusing on algorithm updates knows that there are several per year that are huge (and make the earth shake). And then there are many small updates that most people don’t even notice. It was great to hear Danny clarify the difference between the two. Barry Schwartz covered that in a post soon after.

The canary in the coal mine: Rich snippets
As the update starting rolling out, I received the first messages and emails from companies that were impacted (and from clients seeing movement). Again, that was on 3/8. And just like with several other major quality updates, the canary in the coal mine was the gain or loss of rich snippets.

Many aren’t aware of this, but there’s a quality threshold to rich snippets. Therefore, you can see sites gain or lose rich snippets when major quality updates roll out. Well, I saw that again with this update. And the first company to contact me was one working on improving quality after getting hit in December. They lost all of their star ratings when that update rolled out, but they gained all of them back with the March 7, 2018 update. Here’s a before and after shot of the percentage of queries yielding star ratings.

So just be aware of this if you see rich snippets disappear, or if you suddenly gain them. There’s a chance that a broad quality update is rolling out.

Letters from the field – Examples of impact:
So we know a major update rolled out and we know that it was focused on quality. And all signs point to Google tinkering with its core algorithm with how it assesses quality. We can think of this update as a refinement of their previous quality updates. What exactly they refined is not known, but it does seem that Google is doing a better job at surfacing higher quality sites.

In this post I’ll cover a number of different examples of impact (including both positive and negative movement). I’ll touch on what those sites were doing and how those things could be negatively or positively impacting the sites algorithmically. Then I’ll cover some important notes for sites moving forward, whether your site was negatively impacted or if recently surged. Let’s jump in.

First a reminder: Significant improvement over the long-term.
I just covered this in my presentation at SMX West, and it’s an important point. When asked about major algorithm updates focused on quality, Google’s John Mueller has been clear several times. Google wants to see significant improvement in quality over the long term. That’s significant and over the long term. Here is a video of John explaining this:

This means that if you’ve been negatively impacted, you probably won’t recover in a few weeks. Actually, you probably won’t recover in a month or two. From what John has said, and what I have seen in the field, it’s typically months of hard work before you can see recovery. So drive forward with big changes. That’s how you can surge back.

Examples of positive impact:

Significant AND Long-term
The first surge I’m going to cover is an interesting one. It’s a site that contacted me a while ago for help and we have stayed in touch ever since. They were impacted negatively by several algorithm updates, including major quality updates. About eight months ago they began a serious remediation project. That included a number of important tasks.

Remember, there’s never one smoking gun when it comes to quality. There’s usually a battery of smoking guns. This site decided to go all-in and tackle several important problems.

First, they enhanced E-A-T by building more high-quality content by expert authors. And that new content helped attract links from well-known sites. That’s really important from an E-A-T perspective. Side note: Marie Haynes asked Gary Illyes at Pubcon about how Google evaluates E-A-T and he said that Google largely looks at links from well-known sites. Therefore, building killer content that attracts links from well-known sites is a really smart thing to do (on several levels, including from an E-A-T perspective).

Second, they highlighted the expertise of their authors. The site wasn’t doing that before and they wanted to make a point to emphasize this after seeing negative impact.

Third, they drastically cut down on aggressive and deceptive advertising. I’ve written about this many times before when covering major quality updates. The Quality Rater Guidelines (QRG) mentions aggressive, disruptive, and deceptive advertising a number of times and I have seen aggressive, disruptive, or deceptive ads many, many times while analyzing sites negatively impacted during these broad quality updates. This company also labeled all ads clearly (to avoid deception), they cut down on aggressiveness, and more.

Last, they improved usability overall. They restructured their site so it was better organized, it was easier for users to traverse, etc. And all of this paid off. They saw a nice increase during the March 7, 2018 update.

Important point: It took them 8 months to see an increase like this. Remember when I mentioned that John Mueller said that Google wants to see significant improvement in quality over the long-term? He’s not kidding… and that’s exactly what happened here.

Battle scars remain – A long road of mostly positive movement.
The next increase I’ll cover is a long-term client of mine. I started helping the company back when medieval Panda and the original Penguin roamed the web. It’s an affiliate site and they have done very well over the years once they recovered from the algorithmic dynamic duo I just mentioned. But they recently started seeing a gradual decline in traffic. That decline looked very Panda-like to me based on the queries leading to the site that dropped.

With the March 7, 2018 update, they saw a really nice increase. I’ve been helping them over the past several months audit the site from a quality perspective (which takes a number of factors into account). For example, content quality, user experience, affiliate setup, and from a technical SEO standpoint. I uncovered some important findings over the past several months and my client worked quickly to make those changes.

They also made changes in how they produce content. So the combination of improving technical SEO, enhancing how they handle their affiliate setup, and enhancing content quality seemed to have paid off.

Infinite Spaces and a boatload of unintended low-quality content
The next example I’ll provide is a site that contacted me after reading my post about infinite spaces. In that post, I covered a case study of a site where I uncovered an infinite spaces problem impacting up to 10M urls. That’s bad, but a company reached out to me via my Facebook page after reading that post to let me know they are using the process I laid out to surface and address their own infinite spaces problem. And get this…. the problem was impacting up to 80M urls — yes, 80M. Wow.

Their SEO team began handling that situation correctly starting in early February and they just messaged me after the March 7, 2018 update to explain that they saw a nice surge. It’s awesome to hear that, although I think everyone involved knows they have more work to do. But it’s great to see a boost during a quality update when they rid their site of 80M urls containing thin content.

No way out… or is there?
Another company I’m helping is in a competitive niche and has seen continuous downturns during quality updates. They also saw a nice increase during this update. They aren’t done yet, since we aren’t far into the engagement, but it was great to see the increase.

They got hammered by the February 2017 update and saw more negative movement during subsequent updates. During my analysis (which I’m still neck deep in), I uncovered a number of quality problems ranging from thin content, low-quality content, technical problems causing quality problems, affiliate issues, and more. They are making changes quickly and moving down the right path, so it was awesome to see the increase.

Examples of negative impact:

The kitchen sink: A potpourri of quality problems:
The first example of a drop I’m going to cover spans the gamut of low-quality user engagement. When digging into this site, I saw many examples of problems that I would surface during an audit. First, the site provides massive amounts of low-quality supplementary content and ads on each page.

From a main content standpoint, the same content can often be found on other sites and the site does nothing to provide a value-add. The content was also split into tabs (which actually launched new urls), with no reason to do that other than to gain more ad impressions. There wasn’t much content, so splitting it across tabs made no sense at all. And to add insult to injury, the site bombards you with deceptive ads and low-quality supplementary content on each page (surrounding the mediocre main content).

And not only are there low-quality ads, they are deceptive too. There’s often no ad label contained in the ad units, which makes it harder to identify what is related content from the site and which are ads that will whisk you off the site downstream. I’ve mentioned deceptive ads many times in my posts about major quality updates and this site had this problem all over the place.

From an expertise, authoritativeness, and trust perspective, the site had NO E-A-T at all. I couldn’t even find solid contact information on the site. And the about section was literally the most general copy you could find. I didn’t see any solid author information either as I traversed the site.

In addition to the ad situation, there were affiliate links prominently displayed on certain page types with no disclosure that they were affiliate links  (very close to the main content). So again, there was a major deception component to the entire site. Like I said, this was the kitchen sink from a low-quality user engagement standpoint.

Giphy
I typically don’t name sites, but I’ve covered this one before (and I’m truly rooting for them). I’m a big fan of Giphy and hope they keep recovering after getting hammered on October 4, 2017 during the fall 2017 “hornets’ nest”. Here was the drop in October.

After getting destroyed as their search pages were deindexed by Google, they started creating new pages that weren’t simply internal search results pages. And that approach has been paying off. They have seen nice increases over the past two months as seen below. But… that just ended. They took a dip during the 3/7/18 update.

So Google’s revamped quality algos are not digging giphy.com. Just an interesting side note.

“Hell hath no fury like a user scorned.”
The next drop is from a site in a competitive niche I focus on heavily. It’s a big brand name in the niche and it just dropped heavily during the March 7 update. When checking out the drop, I noticed a sinister problem (that I’m assuming they know is going on). The site is essentially cloaking and showing users one thinner version of the content, but showing Google a much more robust version. There’s also an aggressive conversion tactic they are using, which destroys the user experience. Therefore, the site contains UX barriers, thin content, cloaking, and aggressive conversion tactics. And they got hit pretty hard.

And there are many more examples of sites improving or dropping during this update (globally). It was a huge update and I can’t possibly cover everything here. I hope these examples were helpful, though.

But guess what? We haven’t seen the end of this update. Read on…

Google’s not done yet! The March 14, 2018 Tremor. And it was huge.
Just when you thought the volatility was done, Google pushes more changes. I started receiving the first emails about the volatility on 3/14/18 and the swings were huge. I’m not sure if this is a tremor (where Google pushes a large update and then follows with tweaks to that update or if this is something else). Based on what I’m seeing, it very well could be connected to March 7. I’m seeing sites that were impacted by the 3/7/18 update with more movement starting on 3/14.

Here are some screenshots of the wild swings:

And here’s an example of a huge increase in Google Analytics based on the tremor:

Here is a close-up view:

I’m digging into those swings now to learn more about the tremor. Some sites are seeing massive gains or losses, so whatever Google pushed was a significant change. I’ll reach out to Google’s Danny Sullivan to see if he can shed some light on the situation. I’ll post an update here after I do.

Moving forward. Be ready for the next broad quality update:
If you have seen negative impact during the March 7, 2018 update or the March 14 tremor, then I have some recommendations for you. Remember, the goal is to increase quality significantly over the long-term.

There is typically not a quick fix. There’s no meta tag or minor change you will implement that will cause a surge during the next broad quality update. Instead, you need to hunt down all quality problems and fix them as quickly as you can. That might take months by the way so “quick” is relative. Below, I’ve included some bullets with my recommendations. And if you’ve read my previous posts about major quality updates, the bullets should be very familiar to you.

• Perform a Crawl Analysis and Audit Through The Lens of Quality: This means crawling your site just like Google would and then surfacing all quality problems (which could include content quality, aggressive advertising issues, UX barriers, and technical SEO problems). Leave no stone unturned. I use DeepCrawl, Screaming Frog, and Sitebulb when performing crawls. I’m on the customer advisory board for DeepCrawl, which is outstanding for running enterprise crawls. I typically use Screaming Frog for surgical crawls, although their latest update enables you to crawl many more urls (and faster). And then I use the “young punk” Sitebulb to polish things off. The combination of the three enable me to get a granular view of a site from a quality perspective.
• Keep creating great things: Continue publishing high quality content (10X). Don’t hold back on doing great things just because you are negatively impacted. Instead, drive forward and let Google know you are producing high-quality content written by experts in your niche, and that users love your site. A byproduct of doing this is that you might gain additional high-quality links. And remember what I said about E-A-T and how Google looks at that? It’s important to do this.
• Gain objective feedback: Get objective feedback from real people. Don’t ask your spouse to review your site, your kids, or your employees. Have real consumers go through your site and give them tasks to complete. Learn about their experience, if there were any annoying problems, and if they felt that your content met, or exceeded, their expectations.
• Nuke aggressive, disruptive, or deceptive ads: Surface and handle aggressive and deceptive advertising that’s running on your site. It’s ok to run advertising, but it’s not ok to overwhelm users with disruptive, aggressive, and deceptive ads. Don’t prioritize monetization over your users. There’s a good chance you’ll get burned if you do.
• Bumps in the road: Understand that you might see bumps in the road as you work towards recovery. Keep driving forward. Keep publishing outstanding content. Keep looking for ways to improve quality. And definitely run all changes through your SEO team, agency, or consultant. Don’t fall back to old ways… Remember, Google only rolls these broad updates focused on quality a few times per year. Don’t miss your opportunity to surge back.

Summary – The March 7, 2018 update was huge and the March 14 tremor was even bigger. Now your work begins.
This was one of the biggest updates I’ve seen in a while. It seems Google once again improved how it assesses quality, and with Google always looking to surface the highest quality content for users, that’s a really big deal. If your site has been impacted negatively, then follow the bullets I listed above. Work hard to significantly enhance quality over the long-term. Fix all of your quality problems. Don’t cherry pick issues to deal with. Tackle them all. That’s how you win. Good luck.

GG

 

Summary: From Maccabees to celebrities to doorways to affiliates, Google took it all on in December of 2017. There were several dates leading up to the holidays with significant movement from an algorithm update standpoint, including December 5, December 12, December 15, December 18, and December 26 (with possible connections between some of those updates). This post covers what I saw while digging into the December volatility.

If you follow me on Twitter, then you already know how crazy December was from an algorithm update standpoint. I was posting many screenshots throughout the month based on what I was seeing across sites. We know Google can push between 1,000 and 1,500 updates per year, but we also know many are small changes that few notice. And on the flip side, we also know there are larger algorithmic changes that cause the earth to shake.

Well, we saw multiple updates in December that did just that. It reminded me of September of this year, when we also saw a number of updates in a short amount of time. That’s when I wrote a post titled, “Enter the Hornets’ Nest” covering those updates. You can think of December’s volatility as a “Holiday Hornets’ Nest” since the updates seemed to increase as we got closer to Christmas Day (and we even saw manual actions being handed out on Christmas Day!) More about that soon.

For those of you unfamiliar with December updates from previous years, Google has explained in the past that they try to limit updates as the holidays approach. But that statement hasn’t held up over the past few years. Last year, we saw significant updates leading up to the holidays (with the last being December 15, 2016). I wrote about those updates on my blog after seeing serious volatility last year. By the way, keep December 15 in the back of your mind. We’ll be revisiting that date shortly, but for 2017 instead. Just an interesting side note.

First, let me cover the dates I saw significant movement and then we’ll start to dig further into the specific updates.

And here is handy table of contents that links to specific sections of the post:

• List of dates in December with significant volatility.
• December 5 – it begins.
• December 12 – The Maccabees Update
• December 15 – Celebrity Update
• December 18 – Relevancy and possibly a continuation of 12/15 changes.
• December 26 – Merry Christmas! Manual actions and more algo changes.
• Recommendations for those impacted.

A quick note about the process I used when analyzing the updates:
I have access to large dataset of sites that have dealt with quality problems in the past. That’s across countries and categories as well. Between the sites I already have access to (and have assisted), new companies reaching out to me after seeing movement during the recent updates (up or down), and then digging into specific verticals during my analysis, I ended up with a list of 153 different websites that were impacted by the December updates.

For the sites I have helped, or have access to, I know the problems they are dealing with, what they have been doing to rectify those issues, etc. In addition, when it made sense, I decided to crawl a number of the sites that were impacted to get a better feel for what was going on from a quality and technical SEO standpoint. As many of you know, sometimes a crawl can reveal a number of problems that are harder to identify manually. More about that soon.

Dates In December With Significant Volatility (With Examples Of Movement)

December 5, 2017

December 12, 2107
(Barry named this the Maccabees update.)

December 15, 2017
I saw many official celebrity sites drop on this date, among other hits and surges. You can read more in my post covering the celebrity update.
Here is the search visibility drop for Channing Tatum’s official website:

And here is the drop from #1 to #11 for his own name:

December 18, 2017 (could be tied to 12/15)

December 26, 2017
Yes, one day after Christmas. Ho ho ho. Note, there were also manual actions dished out on Christmas Day, but I also saw algorithmic changes too – showing on the 26th. Note, there was more volatility on 1/4 as well, and you can see that in one of the screenshots below. So Google apparently wasn’t done yet… the volatility continued into early January 2018. I saw movement on a number of sites on 1/4/18.

Important Note: Google confirmed that they pushed multiple changes in a short amount of time in December. Actually, Danny Sullivan said, “several minor improvements”. Therefore, it’s really hard to pin down what each update targeted (since they undoubtedly overlapped in December). Also, some sites seemed to be impacted during multiple dates in December, and those sites often had a number of problems. I’ll cover what I’m seeing below, but the core point is to understand the problems overall (versus trying to connect one date with one set of problems). Also, Danny said they were “minor changes”. Based on the hits and surges I analyzed, they didn’t look minor. :)

More details about each update:

December 5, 2017 – Over-optimization, doorway-like pages.
Once I started digging into the data, you could clearly see movement on 12/5/17. And although many sites impacted by the 12/12 date were targeting many keyword permutations, I saw a number of those sites were actually impacted starting on 12/5.

The reason I bring this up is because Barry Schwartz dug into a number of sites that claimed to have been hit by the Maccabees update on 12/12 and he saw a number of those sites were targeting many keyword permutations. He was right and many employed doorway-like pages. But based on the data I analyzed, I saw a number of sites employing that tactic hit on 12/5/17 as well.

Some were large-scale sites targeting many locations or keyword variations. I saw impact on a range of different sites, including large-scale directories, ecommerce retailers, affiliate sites, etc. So as part of that update, Google could have made be an adjustment to how it algorithmically handles over-optimization, keyword stuffing, doorway pages, etc.

It was clear that the sites were targeting many different keyword variations on specific pages (again, doorway page-like). The pages were often over-optimized as well, with many keyword variations targeted in their titles tags. For example, I found close to 800 different pages on one site with nearly the same title tag (all targeting slight variations in keywords). And many of those pages were thin and low-quality. When checking the site overall, I see thousands of those urls indexed.

Here’s a quick visual of how those pages were laid out. Again, there were close to 800 of these on the site… And notice the blank area where main content should be. This is just one example, but I saw many during my travels while analyzing the 12/5 and 12/12 updates.

December 12, 2017 – Maccabees Update. A mixed bag of over-optimization and quality problems.
The movement on December 12 was substantial and gained the attention of many site owners and SEOs. Barry Schwartz covered the update heavily on Search Engine Roundtable and he also dug into a number of sites that were hit on that day. As mentioned earlier, Barry saw a range of problems, but a number of sites were targeting many keyword variations (doorway-like). That’s very similar to what I saw on 12/5 as well.

While analyzing sites that truly dropped or surged during 12/12 (and not 12/5), you could see a range of problems on the sites that were impacted. Based on the data I have access to, some sites impacted fell into the keyword permutations bucket (over-optimized and doorway page-like just like Barry saw), while other sites negatively impacted had many of the usual suspects from a quality standpoint. I also saw heavy affiliate impact. I saw a number of affiliate sites prioritizing monetization over user experience that were negatively impacted on 12/12.

And from a quality update standpoint, the term “quality” can mean several things from low-quality content to user experience barriers to aggressive and disruptive advertising, and even technical problems that cause quality problems. I have covered these issues many times in the past while writing about major algorithm updates.

So to me, 12/12 looked like Google pushed a few changes, including what many would call a “quality update”. Again, I’ve written about many of these updates over the years (including August 2017, May 2017, and February 2017, and more). You can read those posts to learn more about what I was seeing then.

For example, check out the percentage of low-quality or thin pages I surfaced on this site which was hit on 12/12:

And here is an example of the layout for one affiliate site that was hit hard. The user experience was horrible. It was clear that monetization was the priority:

I also saw sites covering what the Quality Rater Guidelines explains as “Your Money or Your Life” topics (YMYL), yet they lacked what’s called E-A-T, or expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness. Sometimes, there were no authors listed, and when they were, they had missing photos, weak bios, and exhibited no expertise in the subject matter (covering health, finance, and more). I believe some were fake. I even saw some disclaimers that the site contained “general information” that was “not written by a professional” in that niche.

Here’s a quick screenshot from the QRG about E-A-T:

So if you were impacted on 12/12, I recommend reading my posts about quality updates and running through the Quality Rater Guidelines (QRG) several times. I surfaced all types of major quality problems on sites impacted by the 12/12 update (beyond the keyword variations problem).

Here are a few bullets directly from my analysis (there are many, this is just a quick list):

• Surfaced over one thousand thin or near-empty pages.
• Contains aggressive ads all over the site, including giant ads above the main content pushing the MC down the page.
• Contains deceptive ads, not labeled, that look like main content, and drive users downstream to advertiser sites. Totally deceptive.
• YMYL, but no E-A-T. Also contains aggressive and disruptive ads. Horrible user experience.
• Low-quality affiliate site. Prioritizing monetization over UX. No surprise this was hit.
• UX barriers galore, including a botched mobile UX. Hard to read the main content and traverse the site. I’m sure many are leaving the site quickly, especially mobile users.
• And more problems that I simply don’t have enough room to include… 

Therefore, you need to objectively analyze your site through the lens of quality, and then make significant improvements over the long-term. John Mueller has explained this several times over the past few years when being asked about major algorithm updates. Don’t put a band-aid on the situation and expect to recover quickly. That simply won’t happen.

Here is John explaining this at 39:33 in the video:


And if you are employing many pages targeting many different keyword permutations, then you should revisit that approach. I would only publish pages when you have enough quality content to meet or exceed user expectations. And I would avoid publishing countless pages containing the same (or close to the same) content, but optimized for many different keyword variations. I could clearly see many sites that were negatively impacted employing that tactic. As Barry Schwartz documented in his post, and based on what I saw as well, there were many sites impacted that contained over-optimized pages.

December 15, 2017 – The Celebrity Update: Relevancy, user-happiness.
While analyzing both the 12/5 and 12/12 updates, I started to notice movement on 12/15 as well.  And that included serious impact to many official celebrity websites (with most of those sites dropping in rankings for the celebrity’s name).

Prior to 12/15/17, many official websites ranked number one for the celebrity name. And then boom, 12/15 arrived, and many of those sites dropped. And some dropped to the bottom of page one, while others dropped off page one. I saw this across many official celebrity sites and wrote a post covering my findings. I also heard back from Danny Sullivan on Twitter that he passed the information along to others at Google after reading my post (I’m assuming to the Search Quality team, Search engineers, etc.)

For example, Tom Cruise, Charlie Sheen, John Lennon, Marilyn Monroe, and more all dropped on 12/15. Here’s an example of John Lennon’s official site ranking #1 before 12/15 and then dropping after 12/15. And check out the search visibility drop for his official site.

Again, you can read my post about the 12/15/17 update to learn more about the algorithm update and to view more examples.

But why would these sites get hammered? Well, if you check many official celebrity websites, you’ll notice major quality problems. The sites are typically thin, don’t contain updated information, sometimes are just single-page websites, they have serious performance problems, and more.

Therefore, it seems Google began treating those official celebrity websites just like any other site starting on 12/15. Which also means… Google wasn’t treating them the same way prior to 12/15. I think that’s the most important point about the update on 12/15. Don’t get too caught up in “celebrity X dropped in rankings”, but you should get caught up in “Google’s core ranking algorithm was treating some official celebrity sites differently than others prior to X date”. That’s the real news with the 12/15 update.

But not all celebrities were hit. I provided an example in my post about Katy Perry’s site, which retained the number one spot for her name. And when you check out her site, you’ll see a much stronger site than most official celebrity sites. There’s more content, it’s well-organized, it contains updated information, and so on. Dare I say that Katie “Roared” her way through the update? :)

John Mueller’s Celebrity Response:
I was able to ask John Mueller a question about the update during the last webmaster hangout video. You can view John’s response below. He basically explained what I wrote above, which was that users might be looking for more, or different information, versus what those official celebrity websites offer. That might be information from Wikipedia, movie information from IMDB, celebrity news, or information from other sites. But again, it’s interesting that the official celebrity sites all ranked number one prior to 12/15.

December 18, 2017 – More relevancy adjustments, Tremor from 12/15?
While analyzing the 12/15 update, it seemed that Google wasn’t done yet. There’s nothing that screams “holiday spirit” like more algorithm updates as we approach Christmas Day. Yes, I saw yet another date with significant movement, which was 12/18/17.

While checking out the drops and surges on that day, they seemed closely tied to relevancy. For example, Google making sure that sites prominently ranking for queries should actually rank for them. And then adjusting the ones that were “overly-prominent” – basically sites that shouldn’t be ranking well for those queries dropped. Sounds very Panda-like, right?

Now, since 12/18 is so close to 12/15, it’s totally possible the impact was from the same update. It’s hard to say. And if you think about it, the celebrity update was about relevancy as well. For example, as John Mueller explained, making sure the right sites are surfaced based on what Google believes users want to see. So again, 12/15 and 12/18 could very well have been the same update (or connected). Remember, Google can push smaller tweaks after larger updates are released. I called those smaller updates “tremors” and John Mueller confirmed that with me back in the “medieval Panda” days.

December 26, 2017 – Manual actions AND algorithmic movement. And Giphy begins its long road back.
Remember I said Google used to avoid pushing updates close to the holidays? Well, you can’t get much closer than the day after Christmas! Also, there were reports of manual actions being handed out on Christmas Day and you could see the damage pretty clearly, like the screenshot below. Notice the big drop and then the quick recovery? That site was hit on 12/25 with a manual action for unnatural links and it only took three to five days to have the manual action revoked. And the site regained many of the keywords quickly (but not all). This was documented by the site owner.

And at the same time, I saw sites surging or dropping algorithmically starting on 12/26. Therefore, not only will Google push changes close to the holidays, they are pushing changes very close to the actual holiday (and even dishing out manual actions on Christmas Day!)

One site that caught my attention that was positively impacted on 12/26/17 was Giphy, which got hammered back in October. I shared the drop on Twitter in October after seeing a massive drop. Google basically started deindexing their /search/ pages in October, which were ranking well and driving a lot of traffic.

Here was the massive drop for Giphy in early October 2017:

On 12/26, Giphy began the long road back to recovery. Note, they didn’t jump back to where they were… but they did surge. And the /search/ pages aren’t driving that surge. Instead, it looks like they are building out explore pages, while their gif pages saw an increase too.

Here is snapshot of rankings changes during the 12/26/17 update for Giphy:

Others saw movement as well on 12/26 (both up and down). And the second site below had been impacted by previous quality updates (February and May of 2017):

Important Side Note: Losing Featured Snippets and Rich Snippets – A sign of a quality update.
I’ve mentioned before that both rich snippets and featured snippets have a quality component. Therefore, sites can lose or gain them when Google refreshes its quality algorithms. Well, we saw more of that during the December updates.

For example, check out the site below, which was negatively impacted by one of the December updates. They had many rich snippets until the update, and then boom, they were removed. Nearly 18% of queries yielded rich snippets prior to the algorithm update and that dropped to just .27%. That’s insane. Video results also drastically dropped, but I haven’t dug into that yet for the site in question. But that’s an interesting side note.

My recommendations for moving forward:
Moving forward, I have some recommendations for site owners that were impacted (and for those that believe they are in the gray area and susceptible to being hit by future updates). First and foremost, always look to hunt down quality problems, UX barriers, aggressive and disruptive advertising, and technical SEO problems. If you stay on top of that, and nip those problems in the bud, you have a much better chance at avoiding a major hit. And that includes surfacing over-optimization and doorway-like pages which were hit on 12/5 and 12/12. Make sure you are not employing any tactics that can cause serious damage. Google clearly made an adjustment from an over-optimization and doorway page standpoint, and many sites were left reeling.

Because if you don’t stay on top of quality problems, and those issues remain on a site for an extended period of time, then you can wake up to a scary situation. I’ve received calls from many companies over the years that fell into the latter category. It’s not pretty and I recommend avoiding that at all costs.

Here’s a quick list of items you can start on now. It doesn’t contain every item you should tackle, but it’s a heck of a starting point:

• Crawl your site today, and then on a regular basis. Hunt down quality problems, technical SEO problems, and more. Fix them ASAP.
• Analyze your site through the lens of quality. Make sure you are providing the best possible content and user experience for the topic at hand. Objectively evaluate content-quality from the standpoint of a typical user searching for queries on Google that lead to those pages.
• Read the Quality Rater Guidelines (QRG) several times, review your site objectively, surface potential problems, and rectify those problems quickly. As I’ve said before, I’m seeing many connections between the QRG and what I’m seeing in the field while analyzing sites impacted by major algorithm updates.
• Ensure your site works well across devices, and make sure you are ready for Google’s mobile-first index. Google is actively moving sites to its mobile-first index now and will continue to do so throughout 2018 (and beyond).
• Make sure your ads don’t send users screaming from your site. And don’t deceive your users with weaved ads or ads that look like main content. Don’t hold affiliate dollars over user experience. That probably won’t work out well for you.
• Remove UX barriers that inhibit people from accomplishing tasks on your site. Google doesn’t want to send people to a site that’s frustrating to use.
• Perform user testing. You never know what real people think about traversing your site until you actually hear from them. You might be shocked what you find.

Summary – The Hornets’ Nest Is The New Norm
I don’t see the frequency of updates slowing down any time soon. As we’ve seen in both September and December of 2017, Google can, and will, push multiple updates in a short amount of time. And that’s without giving much information about the specific updates. I recommend reading my closing tips, which can help weed out quality problems. And I would do this even if you haven’t been hit by an algorithm update. Some proactive work now can help maintain the long-term health of your site.

Moving forward, I’ll continue sharing more of what I’m seeing volatility-wise here on my blog, on Twitter, Facebook, etc. And if history has shown us anything, I’ll be posting about the next wave of updates pretty soon.

Welcome to Google Land. Please keep your arms, legs, and websites inside the vehicle at all times. :)

GG