The Internet Marketing Driver

  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
    • Algorithm Update Recovery
    • Technical SEO Audits
    • Website Redesigns and Site Migrations
    • SEO Training
  • Blog
    • Web Stories
  • Contact GSQi

From Inbound Links To The Rater Guidelines To AdSense, 7 Important Facts About Google Algorithm Updates As Told By Googlers

September 25, 2017 By Glenn Gabe 8 Comments

Share
Tweet
Share
Email

Facts About Google Algorithm Updates

While helping companies deal with major algorithm updates, I tend to field a lot of questions. For example, marketing teams, developers, designers, and even c-level executives tend to pepper me with questions about quality updates, Panda, and other disturbances in the Google force.

When answering questions about topics like these, it’s great to respond with information directly from Google, when possible. It’s one of the reasons I have a Google archive in my office protected by booby traps, poison darts, and a pressure-sensitive safe that triggers a giant rolling boulder like in Indiana Jones. Hey, I like to be prepared.

Indiana Jones rolling boulder.

So, after answering a number of questions over and over, I thought it might be a good idea to write a blog post listing some of the more interesting points. My hope is that this post can help you understand more about major algorithm updates, or that it enables you to pass this information along to your own clients or internal teams.

Important Notes About Algorithm Updates, Directly From Googlers:

1. AdSense is NOT the organic side. Actually, the paid and organic sides don’t talk… at all.
There are times companies call me after getting hit by a major algorithm update and they are in a state of confusion. During that time, I’ve unfortunately heard some say, “Google even looked at our site and said all was ok!”

When that happens, I already know what went down. I typically respond by asking who exactly at Google reviewed their site (knowing that it’s probably not someone from the organic side). And the response 99.5% of the time is, “someone from the AdSense team…”

Well, that would be great if the AdSense team had any impact on, or knowledge of, how the organic side works (which they don’t). And it would be great if the organic side was in tune with the AdSense team, which they aren’t.

Google’s Gary Illyes even said the two teams “don’t talk, pretty much ever.”
Gary Illyes about the AdSense Team.

I’ve also heard from site owners that their aggressive, disruptive, and deceptive ads should not get them hammered by an algo update because they are AdSense ads. You know, Google would never do that since it’s one of their own products…

That’s completely false!

I’ve helped many sites that run AdSense that got hammered by algorithm updates. Actually, I’ve helped a few of the top 20 AdSense earners that got smoked by quality updates. Beware.

2. Impacted by a quality update? Google looks for significant changes over the long-term.
If you’ve followed my posts about major algorithm updates, then you know we’ve seen a number of quality updates recently. That’s when Google refreshes its quality algorithms, which could cause serious volatility in the SERPs. It’s not uncommon for me to get calls from companies that have seen drops of 40%+, while also seeing other sites surge.

When speaking with companies that have seen negative movement, it’s not long before I get the question, “so what do we need to do in order to recover and how long will it take?” It’s not an easy question to answer, since you need to complete a thorough audit and crawl analysis to surface core quality problems riddling a site. And it’s also never one smoking gun. It’s typically a batter of smoking guns causing problems.

And that’s why it’s great to hear Google’s John Mueller respond to that question during webmaster hangouts. John has explained several times how to deal with negative movement due to quality updates. He said Google wants to see significant changes from a quality standpoint, and over the long-term.

After helping many companies with algorithmic hits over the years, I completely agree. I’ve rarely seen sites bounce back quickly. Instead, sites need to make big changes in quality and maintain those changes over the long-term to see positive movement.

Here is John explaining that (at 39:33 in the video):

3. Featured snippets and rich snippets have a quality component.
I find many still don’t know this, but both featured snippets and rich snippets have a quality component baked in. Therefore, if you are impacted by a quality update, then you can absolutely lose (or gain) rich snippets or featured snippets.

Also, rich snippets are NOT the same as featured snippets. I’ve heard many people mistakenly use the terms interchangeably. Rich snippets include additional information in the SERP listing and you can use structured data to receive them. For example, rich snippets include star ratings, product information, etc. that are attached to the SERP listing.

Example of rich snippets.
Featured snippets are algorithmically-selected answers that sit in position 0 (typically above the organic results). They are their own search result and can include paragraphs, images, and tables. By the way, I’m presenting the latest about featured snippets at SMX East next month. Like last year, there’s a lot to cover.Example of a featured snippet.

I have seen the loss of rich snippets and featured snippets many times while helping companies after they were impacted by a major algorithm update focused on quality. Once again, Google’s John Mueller has explained the quality component several times in the past.

Here is video of John explaining the quality component to rich snippets (at 6:20 in the video):

And here is a screenshot I posted when writing about major algorithm updates (and the loss or gain of rich snippets). It was clear that the rich snippets algorithm was refreshed during the quality update.

A rich snippets surge during February 7, 2017 quality update:

Rich snippet impact during algorithm updates.

4. QRG is gold. Read it 10X.
Google’s Quality Rater Guidelines (QRG) is printed out and bound in my office. I’m not kidding. The QRG is packed with 160 pages of SEO gold. In the QRG, you will find many examples of what Google deems high quality versus low quality, and across various types of websites. I still find many haven’t read the rater guidelines or internalized the contents, which is CRAZY. You can learn more about the rater guidelines and download the PDF here.

If you’re trying to better understand how Google’s quality algorithms work, then you need to look no further than the QRG. Don’t believe me? Maybe you’ll believe Google’s Paul Haahr, a lead ranking engineer at Google (and a veteran Google employee). He’s been at the company since 2002.

While responding to questions about Google patents, Paul explained, “…the rater guidelines are intended to be clear descriptions and examples of what we think users want.”

Yes, read that again. A lead ranking engineer at Google said to read the QRG to see tangible examples of what Google believes users want.
Google's Paul Haahr About The Quality Rater Guidelines (QRG)
I typically send the QRG to new clients to make sure they understand what it is, how human raters evaluate changes to Google’s algorithms, etc. And you should too.

5. Seeing wild fluctuations for certain queries or pages. Convince Google’s quality algorithms!
If you’ve ever seen wild fluctuations in rankings for certain queries or pages, then there could be a good reason for that. John Mueller recently explained that it could mean that Google’s quality algorithms are simply not convinced your site is the right result based on the query at hand.

John recommended to boost the quality of the page and site in order to cross the quality threshold that would cause those fluctuations to die down. I always think it’s a good idea to review queries leading to your site to make sure your content is meeting or exceeding expectations.

I’ve written about this a lot when covering major algorithm updates. Google is always looking to provide the best result for users. Make sure Google’s algorithms understand your content is the best, and by far.

Here’s the video of John explaining this (at 3:26 in the video):


6. All pages indexed count when evaluating quality.
When helping hunt down low quality or thin content, I will often surface problematic pages that were published a long time ago. For example, older content from years ago. When bringing this up to companies that have been negatively impacted, some explain that they never took care of those urls since they’re old, and can’t hurt them.

That’s not true! Google’s John Mueller has explained several times that all pages indexed will be evaluated when determining “quality” for a site. So those old pages can hurt you. Don’t ignore them… Instead, you should form a plan for properly handling them. That can mean boosting the content quality, noindexing the urls or removing the content (via 404s).

Here is John explaining that at 25:20 in the video:

Jen Slegg also covered this on the The SEM Post based on a webmaster hangout video. Here is a quote from John about low quality content and counting all pages indexed. You can read Jen’s post for more information:
“From our point of view, our quality algorithms do look at the website overall, so they do look at everything that’s indexed.”

7. Bonus From Me: Massive number of inbound links does not mean you’re safe from algorithm updates.
OK, Google didn’t say this. I’m saying it. The reason I can say it is because I’ve helped some extremely powerful sites with massive link profiles that reached out to me after getting crushed by major algorithm updates.

Many in the SEO industry are hyper-focused on links believing that the more links you can get, the safer you’ll be from algorithm updates. Sure, it’s smart to build the right links over time, but believe me, they won’t save you from getting hit by a major algorithm update. Again, I’ve helped some companies with incredibly powerful link profiles that got obliterated by major algorithm updates. Their link profiles didn’t save them, and they won’t save your site either.

Google’s quality algorithms are simply trying to surface the highest quality content for users based on query. And if a larger site with many links has a lot of quality problems, it can get hit just like any other site.

Here are two quick examples based on Majestic data. Both sites have been impacted by several Google algorithm updates over the years, yet the first has 28M+ inbound links showing in Majestic’s Fresh Index, from over 170K different domains. And the second has 10M+ links from over 118K different domains.

Inbound links to site impacted by Google algorithm updates.

Inbound links from site impacted by Google algorithm update.

Summary – Bookmark these quotes.
So there you have it. Several quotes from Googlers related to algorithm updates. There’s a good chance you’ll come across questions about these topics in the field, and the quotes I listed above might just help your cause. There are times a solid comment from a Googler can temper even the most aggressive critic. And that can go a long way to helping your clients, company, or agency bounce back from major drops in rankings and traffic.

GG

 

Share
Tweet
Share
Email

Filed Under: algorithm-updates, google, seo

Connect with Glenn Gabe today!

Latest Blog Posts

  • How to compare hourly sessions in Google Analytics 4 to track the impact from major Google algorithm updates (like broad core updates)
  • It’s all in the (site) name: 9 tips for troubleshooting why your site name isn’t showing up properly in the Google search results
  • Google Explore – The sneaky mobile content feed that’s displacing rankings in mobile search and could be eating clicks and impressions
  • Bing Chat in the Edge Sidebar – An AI companion that can summarize articles, provide additional information, and even generate new content as you browse the web
  • The Google “Code Red” That Triggered Thousands of “Code Reds” at Publishers: Bard, Bing Chat, And The Potential Impact of AI in the Search Results
  • Continuous Scroll And The GSC Void: Did The Launch Of Continuous Scroll In Google’s Desktop Search Results Impact Impressions And Clicks? [Study]
  • How to analyze the impact of continuous scroll in Google’s desktop search results using Analytics Edge and the GSC API
  • Percent Human: A list of tools for detecting lower-quality AI content
  • True Destination – Demystifying the confusing, but often accurate, true destination url for redirects in Google Search Console’s coverage reporting
  • Google’s September 2022 Broad Core Product Reviews Update (BCPRU) – The complexity and confusion when major algorithm updates overlap

Web Stories

  • Google’s December 2021 Product Reviews Update – Key Findings
  • Google’s April 2021 Product Reviews Update – Key Points For Site Owners and Affiliate Marketers
  • Google’s New Page Experience Signal
  • Google’s Disqus Indexing Bug
  • Learn more about Web Stories developed by Glenn Gabe

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi
Copyright © 2023 G-Squared Interactive LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Are you ok with the site using cookies? You can opt-out at a later time if you wish. Cookie settings ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. You can read our privacy policy for more information.
Cookie Consent