The Internet Marketing Driver

  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
    • Algorithm Update Recovery
    • Technical SEO Audits
    • Website Redesigns and Site Migrations
    • SEO Training
  • Blog
    • Web Stories
  • Contact GSQi

November 10, 2016 Google Algorithm Update – Was It A Core Ranking Update, The Mobile-first Index Being Tested, or Both? (Updated)

November 16, 2016 By Glenn Gabe 33 Comments

Share
Tweet
Share
Email

November 10, 2016 Google Algorithm Update

{Update: Saturday, November 19, 2016 – I saw reversals starting yesterday, November 18 (both recoveries and drops), which supports my theory that this was the mobile-first index being tested. I have provided more information below at the end of this post about what I’m seeing — including screenshots.}

The fall of 2016 has been one of the most volatile ones I have seen in a long time algorithm update-wise. We started with a local spam update and a quality update on 8/31 (simultaneously), then we had Penguin 4 roll out in multiple stages in September and early October, and then I picked up two more core ranking updates (which I hope to write about soon). But now we have another update that started around 11/10, and some sites are seeing significant movement (either up or down).

I’ve been digging into sites that have been impacted in order to analyze each situation. Here are some screenshots of the movement I’m seeing search visibility-wise:

Surge during November 10, 2016 Google Algorithm Update

Drop during the November 10, 2016 Google Algorithm Update

Drop during the November 10, 2016 Google Algorithm Update

When checking the search history of various sites that have been impacted, I am seeing a lot of connection to previous quality updates. For example, here is a site impacted on 11/10/16 that was also impacted by several other quality updates.

The connection between the November 10, 2016 update and other quality updates.

Now, based on what I’ve seen, it’s hard to say if this was just a quality update, or if there is another component at work. One thing is for sure, I kept surfacing an interesting finding across sites that were impacted – and it involved mobile. And with Google announcing on 11/4 (just days before we saw this update) that they were beginning to test a mobile-first index, the timing is very, very interesting.

The Connection Between Mobile Problems and Negative Impact
So, during the June quality update, I mentioned that I saw sites recovering that had improved their mobile setup. I speculated that maybe Google was handling the mobile version of the urls differently than the desktop (which would be a huge change). Here’s that segment from my June post:

Interesting Situation -> Desktop Horrible, Mobile OK
I checked one site that saw a major increase during the June update that got hit by the November 2015 update. When checking the desktop version of the site, it looked like minor changes had been made. That had me wondering why the site recovered. In other words, it still wasn’t a great user experience. But, checking on mobile yielded a much smoother, less aggressive approach. I’m not saying this was 100% why they surged back, but we know mobile is incredibly important, and their user experience and advertising situation was much, much better on mobile than desktop. Just an interesting side note.

Well, when checking pages that dropped across sites negatively impacted by the November 10, 2016 update, I saw a lot of mobile problems. That included popups, interstitials, render problems, UIs breaking, thinner and disorganized content on mobile urls, and more.

For example, here’s a nice one that smacked me in the face when checking the page on mobile:

Mobile interstitial.

And if you’re thinking, hey, Google’s coming out with a mobile popup algo on January 10, so that can’t be the case now! Think again. With the mobile-first index, Google will index the mobile page as the canonical url, and if you’re providing a popup or interstitial, Google can see that as your primary content. I confirmed that with Google’s John Mueller last night. See the tweet below.

John Mueller about mobile interstitials.

Beyond popups and interstitials, I came across numerous situations where the mobile UI was breaking. For example, the content would render, but the user could move that entire block of content around (by swiping). That was clearly a tech problem. And when you did that, here’s what the viewport could look like:

Mobile UI problems.

Anyway, I saw enough mobile problems on sites negatively impacted that it had me thinking we could be seeing the mobile-first index in action. I can’t say for sure that’s the case, but the timing makes sense, the problems I’m seeing make sense, etc.

Sites Seeing Positive Movement = Solid Mobile Setup
On the flip side, I analyzed a number of sites seeing positive movement during the 11/10/16 Google update, and they provided a clean and strong mobile setup. Many were responsive, did not provide crazy popups or interstitials, did not have UI problems, etc.

Here is the search visibility from a site seeing an increase during this update (and it provides a solid mobile setup):

Site with solid mobile setup surging during November 10, 2016 Google algorithm update.
And here is an example of rankings jumping for another site seeing positive movement based on the update. Some rankings jumped +80, +41, +31, etc.

Rankings increase based on the November 10, 2016 algorithm update.


———————————–
Important Update: Reversals Starting On Friday, November 18:
I have seen reversals of the impact from the November 10, 2016 algorithm update starting on Friday, November 18. Sites that surged are dropping back down and sites that dropped are recovering. This supports my theory that the mobile-first index was being tested. Here are two examples of reversals:

A large drop on November 10 and then recovery on November 18

A surge on November 10 and then a drop on November 18.

A drop on November 10 and then a recovery on November 18.

So if this test tells us anything it’s that the mobile-first index can indeed cause significant movement in the SERPs. I highly  recommend checking your mobile setup (as I explain below) and making sure your mobile pages contain sufficient content, don’t have render issues, etc. We don’t know the exact date of the full rollout of the mobile-first index, but it’s clearly getting close. Stay tuned.
———————————–

Core Ranking Update, Mobile-first Index, or Both??
With the amount of volatility this fall, it’s hard to say that the November 10, 2016 update is ONLY the mobile-first index in action. But, it very well could be part of what’s going on. For example, there could have been a core ranking algo update, in addition to, more testing of the mobile-first index. And maybe the sites I’m seeing with major mobile problems are being impacted by the mobile-first piece. Again, hard to say for sure.

I’ll try and post more as I analyze additional sites impacted by the 11/10 update. In the meantime, I recommend checking your stats to see if you’ve been impacted (either positively or negatively). And if you’ve been negatively impacted, check your mobile setup. Are there barriers, broken UIs, content problems, or other issues you are presenting to users? And content-wise, make sure you are providing the full content on your mobile page (if you are using separate mobile urls).

One thing is for sure, this has been a very interesting update to analyze. The timing, and findings, lead me to think we just might be seeing the mobile-first index in action. Stay tuned. :)

GG

 

Share
Tweet
Share
Email

Filed Under: algorithm-updates, google, seo

Connect with Glenn Gabe today!

Latest Blog Posts

  • How to compare hourly sessions in Google Analytics 4 to track the impact from major Google algorithm updates (like broad core updates)
  • It’s all in the (site) name: 9 tips for troubleshooting why your site name isn’t showing up properly in the Google search results
  • Google Explore – The sneaky mobile content feed that’s displacing rankings in mobile search and could be eating clicks and impressions
  • Bing Chat in the Edge Sidebar – An AI companion that can summarize articles, provide additional information, and even generate new content as you browse the web
  • The Google “Code Red” That Triggered Thousands of “Code Reds” at Publishers: Bard, Bing Chat, And The Potential Impact of AI in the Search Results
  • Continuous Scroll And The GSC Void: Did The Launch Of Continuous Scroll In Google’s Desktop Search Results Impact Impressions And Clicks? [Study]
  • How to analyze the impact of continuous scroll in Google’s desktop search results using Analytics Edge and the GSC API
  • Percent Human: A list of tools for detecting lower-quality AI content
  • True Destination – Demystifying the confusing, but often accurate, true destination url for redirects in Google Search Console’s coverage reporting
  • Google’s September 2022 Broad Core Product Reviews Update (BCPRU) – The complexity and confusion when major algorithm updates overlap

Web Stories

  • Google’s December 2021 Product Reviews Update – Key Findings
  • Google’s April 2021 Product Reviews Update – Key Points For Site Owners and Affiliate Marketers
  • Google’s New Page Experience Signal
  • Google’s Disqus Indexing Bug
  • Learn more about Web Stories developed by Glenn Gabe

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi
Copyright © 2023 G-Squared Interactive LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Are you ok with the site using cookies? You can opt-out at a later time if you wish. Cookie settings ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. You can read our privacy policy for more information.
Cookie Consent