As of July 2013, Google will not confirm Panda updates anymore. And as I explained in my post about unconfirmed Panda updates, this can lead to serious confusion for webmasters. For example, if Panda updates are not documented, then it becomes that much harder to understand why a serious drop in organic search traffic occurred. Was it Panda, a smaller algo change, was the drop due to links, or other factors? Even when Panda updates were confirmed, it was still a a confusing topic for business owners. And now it’s even more confusing since those updates are cloaked.
According to John Mueller of Google (via a webmaster hangout video), the Panda algorithm is now trusted enough that Google feels comfortable rolling it out once per month. That link should jump you to 22:58 in a video where John speaks about Panda. It’s not real-time like some people think, it’s simply trusted more than it once was (and Google can bypass some of the testing it used to implement prior to rolling out Panda). The new Panda can take ten days to fully roll out, and again, Google will not provide confirmation of the updates. So yes, Panda updates have been occurring since the last confirmed update, but it’s just harder to pinpoint those exact dates.
Human Panda Barometers
In my post about unconfirmed Panda updates, I explained that SEOs well-versed in Panda can typically shed some light on new updates. That’s because they have access to a lot of data. And not just any data, but Panda data. The more companies an SEO is helping with Panda, the more that SEO has visibility into when Panda actually rolls out. In addition, SEOs heavily working with Panda might have more companies reach out to them that were impacted by subsequent Panda updates. That’s even more Panda data to analyze.
That’s why I believe SEOs heavily involved with algorithm updates can act like human Panda barometers, and can help determine when new updates roll out. Based on my work with Panda, I’ve had the opportunity to see when some cloaked Panda updates rolled out (like the August and September Panda updates that I documented in my post from November). The reason I can identify some of the newer Panda updates is because some of the companies I’m helping see recovery, while other companies that were just hit by Panda reach out to me for help. The combination of the two enables me to pick up when some Panda updates roll out.
Welcoming 2014 with a Panda Update – January 11th Specifically
So, 2014 kicked off and I was wondering when the first major algorithm update would happen. And it didn’t take long… as January 11th was a tough day for many webmasters. Right around the 11th, I noticed an uptick in webmaster chatter about an update occurring, which quickly led me to Google Analytics to trend Google organic search traffic across several websites dealing with Panda problems. Low and behold, there was significant movement.
In addition to companies I am currently helping, my inbox also confirmed something was going on. I had several new companies reaching out to me after the 11th explaining that they saw a major hit starting on that date. Upon checking their reporting, you could clearly see a significant drop beginning on January 11, 2014. And digging deeper revealed that a number of those companies had battled with Panda in the past. A few had also exchanged blows with Phantom on May 8, 2013.
This led me to believe that we were witnessing our first Panda update of 2014. And since I’m a big believer in naming updates to document them specifically, I’m going to name this one too. I’m calling it Panda UJan14, for “Unconfirmed January 2014”. I think this naming convention works extremely well, since the new Panda is supposed to roll out monthly. Providing the month and year in the update will help clarify when those updates rolled out.
And based on the data I have analyzed since July, here are the Panda updates I believe have rolled out since the last confirmed update in July 2013. Notice how they are approximately one month apart:
- Panda UAug2013 – on August 26th
- Panda USep2013 – on September 16th
- Panda UNov2013 – on November 18th – (Note, I don’t have a lot of data backing this update, but several sites I analyzed saw significant movement on the 18.)
- Panda UDec2013 – on December 17th
- The latest – Panda UJan2014 – on January 11, 2014
The Impact of Panda UJan14
Let’s start with the negative impact of the latest Panda update. The companies that reached out to me after getting hit by Panda UJan14 saw a big drop from Google Organic search traffic. That ranged from 20-35% and began on January 11, 2014. Here’s the SEO visibility of another site hit by the January Panda update:
As mentioned earlier, a number of those companies had previous battles with Panda. Clearly, they had content quality issues from a Panda standpoint. When speaking with the business owners about the drop, they all explained implementing changes over the years when dealing with previous Panda updates. But as I explained in a post about the grey area of Panda, if you don’t significantly tackle the content quality situation, you could very well get hit again (or not recover in the first place). It’s extremely important to make significant changes in order to exit the grey area. If you don’t, you could sit in the grey area of Panda forever, never knowing how close you are to recovery. Several of the companies that were hit in January did not do enough to clean up their Panda issues, and were subsequently hit with another Panda update.
Now the positive impact from UJan2014. On the flip side of the Panda hits were some positive stories. A few companies I have been helping saw increases ranging from 15-25% based on the January 11, 2014 update. These were companies that experienced previous Panda and/or Phantom hits, have been working on fixing their content problems, and saw an increase in Google organic traffic during the UCJan14 update.
It’s important to note that several of the companies did not recover fully to pre-Panda or pre-Phantom levels, but they definitely saw a nice increase. Remember, there’s a reason the sites got hit by Panda in the first place. The content that was once ranking well and driving traffic shouldn’t have been ranking that well in the first place… which led to a lot of traffic with serious engagement issues. And serious engagement issues (like extremely low dwell time), can cause a Panda attack. More context about that situation in my Search Engine Watch column about the sinister surge before Panda strikes.
Others Benefiting From the Drop
In addition to websites recovering from Panda, I noticed a number of companies simply benefiting from the hits others were taking. For example, if certain companies drop out of the rankings, then others take their place. Those companies were simply benefiting from the drop in rankings of January Panda victims.
For example, here’s the trending for a site that directly competes with a Panda victim I analyzed. Notice the jump starting around January 11, 2014.
A Note About Expedia – Was it Panda Versus a Manual Action?
It sure looks that way to me. Nobody knows for sure other than Google and Expedia, but the drop occurred exactly when I saw the January Panda update. Check out the trending below based on Search Metrics data.
That’s just something to think about since many people believe that Expedia was hit by an unnatural links penalty. I tend to think it was Panda instead. That said, I would have to heavily analyze the keywords that were impacted, the content that was once ranking, etc. to better determine if that was the case.
Summary – The Importance of Monitoring Cloaked Panda Updates
As I explained above, it’s getting extremely difficult to identify Panda updates. They are supposed to roll out monthly, take ten days to fully roll out, but Google won’t confirm when the updates occur. For the average business owner, this is a recipe for serious confusion when organic search trending takes a dive.
My goal with posts like this one is to provide as much data as I can with regard to major algorithm updates so webmasters can take the appropriate actions to rectify the problems at hand. Without understanding the specific algorithm update that hits a website, companies could struggle with deciphering the root cause of the problem. And that could easily lead to spinning wheels, or in a worst case scenario, implementing changes that actually make the situation worse SEO-wise. Moving forward, I’ll try and document subsequent Panda updates the best I can.
But hold on… has the next Panda update already rolled out?? There’s a lot of chatter about a February update and I am seeing movement across sites hit by Panda (starting around February 11th). It very well could be Panda UFeb14. The timing makes a lot of sense as well, since the last update was exactly one month ago. I’ll know more in a few days once more data comes in. Stay tuned. :)
GG
Without displaying the actual data did their drop in SearchMetrics data match with a drop in GWT Impressions?
Yes, the drops lined up with GWT data. SearchMetrics data was stronger for the larger sites I analyzed, but I did see similar trending even for smaller sites hit by the January Panda Update.
That would explain why http://www.algoroo.com is so orange and red!
Yes, great point Arjan! It does jump up around the 11th. Between the companies I’m helping with Panda, and new hits, it was very interesting to analyze the impact from UJan14. And I have a feeling UFeb14 rolled out a few days ago. I need to analyze more data before saying that’s the case though. :)
Curious to know why you don’t think these recoveries could not be the result of penguin. For such a long reasoned article that references Panda and Phantom so many times I was surprised to see Google’s other favorite pet not mentioned once.
Also for all my sites that recovered at that time, they pointed to the 9th as the point of affect while I have heard several others make claims to the 8th.
The 11th strikes me as an odd time for Google to roll out an update.
Great questions. Based on my analysis, the update impacted sites that had been dealing with Panda and/or Phantom issues in the past (and not an unnatural links problem). Also, the companies that reached out to me with new hits also had content quality problems (and not unnatural links).
I’ve done a boatload of Penguin work, and I have analyzed over 350 sites hit by Penguin since 1.0. You can check my blog and my Search Engine Watch column for posts related to Penguin. I’ve written quite a few. This did not seem like a Penguin update at all. In addition, Google typically confirms Penguin updates. The Panda algorithm is different, as they trust the algo more now (so they feel comfortable rolling it out monthly).
Regarding dates, it can take 10 days for Panda to fully roll out, but I saw almost all of the impact starting on 11th. I’m not saying all sites will see it on the 11th, but I did across a number of websites. I hope that helps.
Thanks, yes I was just surprised to not see your thoughts on why it wasn’t Penguin covered.
I have find local website is ranking good in SERP on local search query. In Jan my website is not ranking with local search query, but now website is coming in top position.
My stats completely agree with both your January and February assessments. In fact, that’s why I looked to see if you’d posted about any Panda updates in 2014 – to see if I was right!
Wow, awesome to hear you saw similar movement. I’m hoping that was movement in the right direction! :)
my website after having a huge surprising jump in google for just afew days from about 10th to 14th february2014,suddenly became disappeared in google rank after the middle of february 2014 till now! :(
do you have any idea about this?can i still have a hope to get my rank back?if yes,how long i have to wait?