The Internet Marketing Driver

  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
    • Algorithm Update Recovery
    • Technical SEO Audits
    • Website Redesigns and Site Migrations
    • SEO Training
  • Blog
    • Web Stories
  • Contact GSQi

Google’s “Found on the Web” Mobile SERP Feature – A Knowledge Graph and Carousel Frankenstein That’s Hard To Ignore

September 29, 2020 By Glenn Gabe Leave a Comment

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Google's Found on the Web Mobile SERP Feature

I was recently performing a SERP analysis for a client and noticed some big differences in performance when comparing mobile to desktop. For example, clicks and click-through rate were much lower on mobile than desktop for certain queries. And when checking the mobile SERPs for those queries, it wasn’t long before I could see the culprit.

It was a “Frankenstein SERP Feature” that’s a hybrid version of the entity carousels we have seen at the top of the SERPs for some time. It contains a combination of entity listings with carousels containing content from across the web. It’s only present in the mobile SERPs and it can take up a huge amount of real estate.

It’s often titled “Found on the web” but can have different titles depending on query. If you focus on publishing content about entities contained in Google’s Knowledge Graph, then you should pay close attention to this feature. It could be impacting your performance right now or could creep into the SERPs at some point for queries you target.

Here is an example of the feature in action:

Google's Found on the web SERP feature in default mode.

And when a listing is expanded, a carousel of cards is exposed:

Google's Found on the web SERP feature with carousel expanded.

In this post, I’ll cover what the feature is, provide examples of it in the SERPs, explain how it’s tracked in Google Search Console (GSC), provide examples of its impact data-wise, and then provide some final tips and recommendations.

What exactly is “Found on the web”?
First, I’ve seen various titles for the feature in the SERPs, so it’s not always titled “Found on the web”. I’ve seen “From the web”, “Around the web”, and even more specific titles based on query. Also, I’m not referring to the standard entity carousels at the top of the SERP. This is more involved.

Here is an example where the SERP feature is titled based on the query and not just “Found on the web”:

Google's Found on the web SERP feature with a title based on query.

It’s worth noting that there was some controversy in 2019 when Barry Schwartz covered the feature after it was surfaced by Cyrus Shepard and shared on Twitter. But since then, I haven’t heard much about this mobile SERP feature. You can read Barry’s post and check out the tweet to see the reaction from SEOs and from Google’s Danny Sullivan.

This is an incredible search result from Google:

• Answers a fairly complex question
• Takes the copy of many 3rd party publisher to create its own independent web page
• Zero visible on-page links to the publishers who provided the data

This is the future of Google Search pic.twitter.com/txNU2Z7HB5

— Cyrus (@CyrusShepard) February 23, 2019

“Found on the web” is a mobile SERP feature that provides a combination of knowledge graph information and carousels housed in an accordion-style UI element. When tapping the arrow button for each entity listing, you see a carousel of additional cards related to that parent entity. As of now, I’ve seen five cards in each carousel and the final card enables you to perform a new search for that specific entity.

Here is an animated gif of the feature in action:

The SERP feature can also be expanded vertically, displaying even more top-level entities. So, you can think of it expanding both horizontally (via carousels) and vertically (by showing even more top-level entities in Google’s knowledge graph).

Google's Found on the web SERP feature vertical expansion.

Which leads to:

Expanding Found on the web to reveal many entity listings.

Where are the carousel listings sourced from?
There are two components to the “Found on the web” mobile SERP feature. First, you have knowledge graph entities that make up the initial list of items. Those do not link outside of the SERP and are not tied to any specific website.

If you tap the arrow for an entity, Google provides a carousel of cards containing search results. The listings are sourced from the web and often contain articles from various sites and publishers. Depending on the query, I found content from a variety of sources. Therefore, this isn’t another carousel with just listings from the most reputable news organizations (like Top Stories). Many different sites are showing up in the cards.

Here is an example of cards sourced from various sources:

And here is a second query showing cards from various types of sites:

What’s the performance impact to sites when “Found on the web” is in the SERP?
Well, I think it’s pretty clear. This is a monster SERP feature that can take up a huge chunk of the mobile search results page. If your pages rank even #2 or #3, users need to scroll down past “Found on the Web” and often past a “People Also Ask” module… You can see both Glassdoor and Great Places to Work are pretty far down the SERP and rank #2 and #3 respectively. More about how position is calculated later in this post, since “Found on the web” and “People Also Ask” can change the positions of other listings GSC-wise:

That said, you do have an opportunity to rank in the carousels (within “Found on the Web”). And if you do, you might have a shot at gaining more clicks. But, you are competing against four other listings in that specific carousel (there are five total cards in the carousel). And then of course, you have a number of other carousels you are competing with in the feature… so it’s not easy when “Found on the web” is present in the SERP.

GSC Performance Stats:
I mentioned earlier that I’m helping a company that targets queries yielding the “Found on the web” mobile SERP feature. Here is a quick example of the stats for some queries where the site ranks well in the core organic listings (but “Found on the web” appears in the mobile SERP).

When checking queries where “Found on the web” appeared, I found a noticeable difference in click-through rate for mobile. Note, the site ranks very well in the 10-blue links for some of these queries, which is why the CTR overall is higher.

In the first example below, the mobile click-through rate is 23.4% when the desktop click-through rate is 30.2% (a 23% difference in CTR):

In the second example, the site is seeing an 11.4% click-through rate on mobile, but a 24.7% click-through rate on desktop (a 54% difference in CTR). Again, the site ranks very well in the 10-blue links for the query, but the “Found on the web” feature is pushing the listing way down the SERP on mobile:

A Note About Content Strategy: Don’t miss an opportunity
If you are publishing content about entities, you are probably wondering what you can do to increase your chances of ranking in the carousels within “Found on the web”. Like most things in SEO, you should spend some serious time analyzing the SERPs, learn what Google is surfacing in the carousels, etc. Then you can build a content strategy that targets topics from different angles.

GSC Tracking:
Last year I wrote a post on Search Engine Land demystifying how Google counts clicks, impressions, and position in Google Search Console (GSC). In that post, I covered carrousels and how they were handled reporting-wise. For example, listing in carousels only receive an impression when they are scrolled into view. So the initial cards in a carousel that are in view by default receive an impression immediately, while cards that need to be scrolled into view must wait for that to happen to receive an impression.

For the “Found on the web” SERP feature, listings are located in carousels, but those carousels are completely hidden on-load. So, unlike a typical carousel, there are no listings visible on-load (so none of the listings will gain an impression at first). The user actually has to tap the arrow button to reveal the carousel in the first place.

Once that happens, the cards that are visible in that carousel receive an impression. But… your listing still might not be in view (if the cards containing your link are off-screen). If that’s the case, your listing would need to be scrolled into view in order to gain an impression. This is all super-important to understand if you want to accurately track performance in GSC.

From a position standpoint, the carousel will take the position of the block element it is contained within (which in this case is “Found the web” ranking #1). So, let’s say your listing is in the third carousel down and someone reveals that carousel by clicking the arrow button. At that point, your listing will gain an impression at position #1. The same goes for the fifth, sixth, or a lower carousel… Again, it will take on the position of the block element (the SERP feature it’s contained within).

Final tips and recommendations if “Found on the web” appears in a SERP you are targeting:

  • Perform a SERP analysis. You can learn so much by reviewing the search results, including the types of content ranking, SERP features present, how Google is interpreting intent, and more.
  • Make sure to check both the desktop and mobile search results when researching queries. The mobile SERPs, in particular, have many interesting SERP features that take up a lot of real estate. Don’t ignore them… they can have a big impact on your own performance.
  • If “Found on the web” is ranking for queries you are targeting, review the content in the carousels to better understand what Google is choosing to rank there. Then perform a gap analysis with your own content to hunt down opportunities.
  • If you have content that fits a carousel, but it’s not ranking, objectively review your own content to understand why that is. Is it comprehensive enough? Does is directly target what users are looking for regarding the topic? And boost your content to make sure it’s the best it can be.
  • Think macro, not just micro. Objectively analyze your site quality overall. Does Google view your site as having high quality and relevant content for users? We don’t know if there a site quality threshold for being added to the “Found on the web” carousels (like there is for Top Stories, Featured Snippets, etc.) but it sure would make sense. If there is, then just focusing on specific pieces of content might not move the needle. You might have to improve quality at the site-level over time.

Summary: Publish content about entities? Don’t ignore “Found on the web”
“Found on the web” is one of the most dynamic mobile SERP features I have seen. It’s hard to ignore the powerful combination of knowledge graph information mixed with publisher content housed in carousels. If you focus on writing content about entities, definitely perform a SERP analysis to see if “Found on the web” is appearing now. It can definitely have a big impact on performance, as it takes up a huge amount of mobile real estate. You never know… with a little tinkering, that Frankenstein element could start working for you. And who doesn’t want to be friends with Frankenstein? :)

GG

Share
Tweet
Share
Email

Filed Under: google, mobile, seo

Connect with Glenn Gabe today!

Latest Blog Posts

  • How to compare hourly sessions in Google Analytics 4 to track the impact from major Google algorithm updates (like broad core updates)
  • It’s all in the (site) name: 9 tips for troubleshooting why your site name isn’t showing up properly in the Google search results
  • Google Explore – The sneaky mobile content feed that’s displacing rankings in mobile search and could be eating clicks and impressions
  • Bing Chat in the Edge Sidebar – An AI companion that can summarize articles, provide additional information, and even generate new content as you browse the web
  • The Google “Code Red” That Triggered Thousands of “Code Reds” at Publishers: Bard, Bing Chat, And The Potential Impact of AI in the Search Results
  • Continuous Scroll And The GSC Void: Did The Launch Of Continuous Scroll In Google’s Desktop Search Results Impact Impressions And Clicks? [Study]
  • How to analyze the impact of continuous scroll in Google’s desktop search results using Analytics Edge and the GSC API
  • Percent Human: A list of tools for detecting lower-quality AI content
  • True Destination – Demystifying the confusing, but often accurate, true destination url for redirects in Google Search Console’s coverage reporting
  • Google’s September 2022 Broad Core Product Reviews Update (BCPRU) – The complexity and confusion when major algorithm updates overlap

Web Stories

  • Google’s December 2021 Product Reviews Update – Key Findings
  • Google’s April 2021 Product Reviews Update – Key Points For Site Owners and Affiliate Marketers
  • Google’s New Page Experience Signal
  • Google’s Disqus Indexing Bug
  • Learn more about Web Stories developed by Glenn Gabe

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi
Copyright © 2023 G-Squared Interactive LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Are you ok with the site using cookies? You can opt-out at a later time if you wish. Cookie settings ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. You can read our privacy policy for more information.
Cookie Consent