Internet Marketing Driver

  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
    • Algorithm Update Recovery
    • Technical SEO Audits
    • Website Redesigns and Site Migrations
    • SEO Training
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi

Google Testing Stationary Map Versus Scrolling Map for New Local Listings

December 29, 2010 By Glenn Gabe

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
12 Shares

Google Testing Stationary and Scrolling Maps for Local Search

In October of 2010, Google launched a major change to its local search listings.. As part of the implementation, there was a potentially big change for paid search advertisers. When Google displayed local listings (based on a query it deemed local in nature), it would show a map in the upper right-hand corner of the search results. That’s fine, but that’s not all the map did… As you scrolled down the page, the map scrolled with you. If paid search listings were present on the right-hand side of the page, then the map covered the paid search listings as it scrolled. As you can imagine, this could have a big impact on the performance of your AdWords campaigns.

Why Aren’t You Scrolling?
As I was testing various local searches this morning, I noticed some strange behavior with the map I mentioned above. I noticed that it wasn’t scrolling for some searches, while it was scrolling for others. After analyzing those searches, it became apparent that the scrolling map functionality wasn’t working when there were paid search ads on the right side of the page (underneath the map). Then I tested searches that yielded no paid search ads on the right side of the page, and the map did scroll down the page. I noticed this behavior on my netbook using both Firefox and Chrome.

Maybe others have seen this before, but I haven’t yet. I ran to my other systems to test this out and I did not notice the same results (the map was scrolling for all local searches, no matter if there were paid search ads on the right side or not). So, Google might be testing the impact of using a stationary map versus a scrolling map (for usability, paid search impact, etc.) This is important, because it could have a big impact on how your paid search campaigns perform. If Google chooses to not scroll the map, then your paid search ads will not be covered (which should improve your click-through rate, visits, sales, etc.) If it chooses to keep the scrolling map, then your ads will be covered part of the time (which could decrease your exposure, click-through, sales, etc.)

Anyway, I took some screen captures of this happening and have provided the short videos below. I apologize for the poor resolution, but I had to take screen captures from my netbook. Regardless, you can still see what’s going on with the map. The first video shows a search for Italian restaurants in new york city (where there were paid search ads on the right side). The second is for a search for pizza in dallas, tx (where there weren’t any paid search ads on the right side).

Needless to say, I’m going to keep a close eye on this. Local businesses should too. :)

GG

Video Showing a Stationary Map When Paid Search Ads Are Present on the Right Side of the Page

Video Showing a Scrolling Map When Paid Search Ads Are Not Present on the Right Side of the Page

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
12 Shares

Filed Under: adwords, google, local-search, SEM, SEO, small-business

Comments

  1. Ryan Beale says

    December 29, 2010 at 11:14 am

    wow, interesting… I had not noticed the stationary map before this post. Thanks for the heads-up. I imagine there will be a significant impact on local PPC – Google Adwords results.

  2. Glenn Gabe says

    December 29, 2010 at 11:26 am

    Thanks Ryan. Yes, I’m wondering what triggered the test… possibly lower PPC revenue, usability issues, etc? I quickly rushed to check my other systems, but only my netbook displayed these results. This could definitely have a major imapct on AdWords (Local).

    GG

  3. Matthew Diehl says

    December 29, 2010 at 11:44 am

    Good find Glenn.

    Perhaps Google’s hopes that companies would bid more to stay in the top 3 back fired and companies are reducing budgets overall due to the reduced effectiveness of the right-hand listings. [It’s all about the $$$]

    Also, just ran a little test on my end to see if it was perhaps browser related. Here is what I found:

    Chrome – Scrolling Map
    Firefox – Scrolling Map
    Safari – Scrolling Map
    IE – Non-Scrolling Map

    Either way, it is interesting that they are switching between the two map functionalities.

  4. Glenn Gabe says

    December 29, 2010 at 11:55 am

    Thanks Matt. I agree, I think the scrolling map that covers paid search ads is having a negative impact on AdWords revenue. It makes complete sense. It wouldn’t surprise me to see the stationary map take hold when paid search ads aren’t present on the right side.

    Regarding testing, only my netbook session displayed the stationary map. My other systems showed the scrolling map like you saw in your testing.

    GG

  5. Chris Pantages says

    December 29, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    Its a test right now it seems (not scrolling for me with FF in SF Bay Area), but the static map to me is preferred. I’d bet more on usability than revenue. From my perspective, the scrolling map was always jerky and distracting and made me want to stop scrolling or leave the page. I manage our firms paid search spend and haven’t noticed any significant change in CTR, but maybe we are not triggering a lot of local searches with our keywords.

  6. Glenn Gabe says

    December 29, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    Thanks for your comment Chris, and I’m glad you are seeing the test also! I agree with you, the scrolling map was awkward. And since I also heavily focus on SEM, I never liked that it scrolled over ads… I hope they do away with it.

    GG

  7. Justin Seibert says

    December 29, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    @Glenn – Good post. I’ve been seeing this for a couple weeks, although haven’t been able to discern a pattern, although there were certain computers that seemed more likely for it to happen to – didn’t go so far as to isolate it down to operating systems, ip’s, logged in, etc., though.

  8. Glenn Gabe says

    December 29, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    Thanks Justin. I’m glad you’ve been seeing the scrolling/stationary map test also. I’m hoping it’s not going to be tailored for specific systems (based on screen size). I started thinking about that earlier, based on a comment from Matt on Twitter (his comment is above). I think it would be great to get rid of the scrolling map… I’m not sure it helps anyone (including Google’s revenue numbers). :)

    GG

  9. Justin Seibert says

    December 29, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Yeah, it is pretty interesting. To add to Matt’s analysis, I have seen it in FF, though only a fairly small percentage of the time. I’m still kind of torn about the scrolling personally (although leaning toward liking it) and am interested in what the numbers have to say. I’d like to know what the average searchers think, but to me it seems to give even more weight to the ads by drawing the eye over to them – both the top ones and the right hand side ones. The thing I’d like to know is if Google tested it the same way they did Instant – half of the testing was normal users (although who knows how that was defined) and half Googlers. That’s a crazy-high split and doesn’t seem like sound ux, but what do I know? I’m just a simple caveman lawyer.:) Look forward to seeing what else you find out.

  10. Matthew Diehl says

    December 30, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    Hey Glenn – got another platform update. I checked this out on my iPad last night and the result…

    iPad (Safari) – Non-Scrolling Map

    Don’t know what the method is to the testing but you noticed this on your netbook so maybe “mobile” devices are getting served this more often.

  11. Glenn Gabe says

    December 30, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    Thanks for the update Matt. After our conversation on Twitter yesterday, I started thinking the same thing. But I did more testing across systems yesterday and noticed both a stationary and scrolling map on other systems (non-mobile) with higher resolutions. That leads me to think it’s a test overall and not for specific devices. I guess we’ll see in the coming months.

    GG

  12. Mike Rose says

    October 3, 2011 at 6:26 pm

    The scrolling map is a horrible idea. If your on a laptop with a small screen its almost impossible to see the paid adds on the right. I was just about to start advertising my small business for the first time when I began to notice the scrolling map. That was the deal breaker . Now that the map stays on top I will advertise with google. Google will ruin the small businesses ad campaign if they continue with the scrolling map.

    • Glenn Gabe says

      October 5, 2011 at 6:32 am

      You definitely bring up some important concerns about the scrolling map and how it inhibits paid search ads. It does hide ads on the right (which is shocking since Google generates ~97% of its revenue from the AdWords system!)

      I wouldn’t shy away from paid search, though. Managed correctly, it can be very powerful for local businesses. And, it covers more than just Search on Google (i.e. You should look at the Google Display Network). :)

      GG

Connect with Glenn Gabe today!

RSS Latest Blog Posts

  • Google Search Console (GSC) reporting for Soft 404s is now more accurate. But where did those Soft 404s go?
  • Google’s December 2020 Broad Core Algorithm Update Part 2: Three Case Studies That Underscore The Complexity and Nuance of Broad Core Updates
  • Google’s December 2020 Broad Core Algorithm Update: Analysis, Observations, Tremors and Reversals, and More Key Points for Site Owners [Part 1 of 2]
  • Exit The Black Hole Of Web Story Tracking – How To Track User Progress In Web Stories Via Event Tracking In Google Analytics
  • Image Packs in Google Web Search – A reason you might be seeing high impressions and rankings in GSC but insanely low click-through rate (CTR)
  • Google’s “Found on the Web” Mobile SERP Feature – A Knowledge Graph and Carousel Frankenstein That’s Hard To Ignore
  • Image Migrations and Lost Signals – How long before images lose signals after a flawed url migration?
  • Web Stories Powered by AMP – 12 Tips and Recommendations For Creating Your First Story
  • Visualizing The SEO Engagement Trap – How To Use Behavior Flow In Google Analytics To View User Frustration [Case Study]
  • The May 2020 Google Core Update – 4 Case Studies That Emphasize The Complexity Of Broad Core Algorithm Updates

Web Stories

  • Google's Disqus Indexing Bug
  • Google's New Page Experience Signal

Archives

  • July 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi
Copyright © 2021 G-Squared Interactive LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

Internet Marketing Driver
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

This site also uses pixels from Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn so we publish content that reaches you on those social networks.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!