The Internet Marketing Driver

  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
    • Algorithm Update Recovery
    • Technical SEO Audits
    • Website Redesigns and Site Migrations
    • SEO Training
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi

The Curious Case of The Disappearing and Reappearing Google Featured Snippet

October 28, 2015 By Glenn Gabe 2 Comments

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
16 Shares

The Disappearing Google Featured Snippet

As Halloween approaches this year, I’m gaining a better understanding of the phrase “Trick or Treat”. Over the past month, I’ve watched Google display a featured snippet for one of my blog posts (the “treat”), only to change that back to a standard snippet (“the trick”). And then back to a featured snippet (“treat”). And you guessed it, back to a standard snippet (“trick”). I really don’t know why that’s happening, but I think it’s an interesting case study.

If you are unfamiliar with featured snippets, then you should read my Search Engine Land column about gaining and losing a featured snippet. In a nutshell, Google can provide an answer at the top of the search results for a query (the featured snippet), along with a link to the third party site containing the content. A featured snippet can also contain visuals, like photos or graphs.

Here’s an example of a featured snippet (since we’ll see plenty of vampires this upcoming Saturday):

Example of a Featured Snippet - Are Vampires Real?

Based on analyzing featured snippets for clients, I know they can drive a massive amount of traffic based on the SERP treatment and the inferred credibility. For example, when Google highlights your content as an answer for a query, separates that content from the rest of the SERP, sometimes provides a visual from your post in the featured snippet, along with a link back to your content. As my case study on SEL documented, you can gain or lose a lot of traffic based on a featured snippet.

It Begins – Pre-processing of a Featured Snippet?
On September 24, 2015, I published my Search Engine Land column explaining how to find queries per url in Google Search Console (GSC). As soon as it was crawled and indexed, I noticed something interesting. It looked like Google was pre-processing a featured snippet.

For example, the description looked like a bulleted list of instructions versus the standard description used for a post. Sure, Google doesn’t always use your meta description, but it also doesn’t always provide a list of items explaining how to do something.

Here is what I saw just 28 minutes after the post was published:

The Pre-processing of a Google Featured Snippet

Needless to say, I wanted to keep an eye on the situation to see if I would receive a featured snippet.

Less Than 2 Weeks Later – It Appears!
I set reminders to check the SERPs daily to see how it was looking. It was about two weeks later that I first saw the featured snippet for a targeted query! And it included a list of six steps from my post along with a visual. It was gorgeous. :)

Featured Snippet With Bulleted List in Google SERPs

So I might have been right! It seems Google was pre-processing the featured snippet by breaking down the steps involved. I remember thinking, “This is AWESOME. I must write about this now.” So I added the topic to my blog post idea bucket and moved on. I was going to try and write the post within a week or so, until…

1 Week Later – Mountain View, We Have a Problem
About a week after noticing the featured snippet, I went to check the SERPs again. I typed in the query, and boom, I saw a standard snippet. That can’t be right… So I opened anther incognito window and checked again. Nope. I opened my chromebook to check on another system. Gone.

Standard Featured Snippet Returns

So it seems Google had already removed the featured snippet! Sure, the SERPs are extremely dynamic, but what could have happened in that one week to remove the featured snippet? The post is a thorough tutorial, it clearly explains how to find queries per url in GSC, and it was published on an authority site (SEL). Come on Google!

So, I took the hit and moved on. But the story doesn’t end there.

2 Weeks Later – I’m Baacckk…
Two weeks later, I was doing some featured snippet detective work for a client and just happened to check the SERP again for my SEL column. And low and behold… the featured snippet was back! But this time it didn’t contain the bulleted list. The visual was still there, but the list was gone. Interesting… but still awesome.

Google Featured Snippet Reappears

Maybe Google realized that the post should yield a featured snippet, but just not in the form of a bulleted list. Or, maybe enough searches for that subject or question occurred to yield a featured snippet. Or maybe this was more testing by Google to see if it warranted a featured snippet at all. Regardless, my featured snippet was back.

The Featured Snippet Returns

3 Days Later – It’s Gone Again
Ugh. Just three days later, the featured snippet was gone again. To be honest, I had no idea what was going on with that featured snippet. I get that featured snippets are algorithmically triggered, so my guess is that the query and/or post is in the gray area for some reason. My post ranks #1 in the SERPs for targeted queries, but does not always yield a featured snippet.

Invisible Man and Google Featured Snippets

Going Straight To The Source: Asking Google
So I decided to go to the source to try and find out what’s going on. I ended up asking both Gary Illyes and John Mueller on Twitter what they thought of the situation. I received an answer, but it was pretty vague.

Gary explained that it’s either ancient aliens (yes, I’m serious) or the fact that Google takes many signals into account when determining when to show a featured snippet. See the Twitter conversation below.

Gary Illyes Regarding Signals That Trigger Featured Snippets:

Gary Illyes Tweet About Featured Snippets

So here we are. Either Google is messing with me or the query/post is in the gray area of featured snippets. Or of course, ancient aliens are involved. :)

Regarding signals that Google takes into account, I started thinking about this more and more after the tweet. What are some of the signals that Google might consider when determining to show a featured snippet? And how could that list help webmasters that are trying to be featured in the SERPs for specific queries?

Based on a quick brainstorm, I have provided some possible signals below. I’m sure this isn’t all of them, but it’s a good start. If you are interesting in driving more featured snippets for your site, then you might want to review this list.

Possible Signals Google Uses When Determining To Show a Featured Snippet:

  • Type of query (i.e. query formed as a question using what, where, who, why, when).
  • Query volume for the question at hand.
  • Content that matches up well with the query (i.e. an answer is clearly provided in an easy to break down format).
  • Authority of the website that the content is published on.
  • SERP engagement. Are users interacting with and clicking through the featured snippet? Or are they bypassing that snippet for listings below?
  • Dwell time while on the destination website. If users bounce back to the SERPs quickly, maybe the content should not yield a featured snippet.
  • Location of the user. Some featured snippets might be location-specific. i.e. Queries pertaining to a specific country or region.
  • Device – Will some featured snippets trigger on desktop vs. mobile, or vice versa?
  • Personalization: Featured snippets based on previous searches and behavior.
  • Author Rank. Does the authority of the author in that given niche play a factor?

Again, I don’t think this is a final list. If you feel there are others signals to add, let me know in the comments below.

Summary – The Gray Area of Featured Snippets
There you have it. A curious case of a disappearing featured snippet in the Google SERPs. To quickly review, I saw what seemed to be Google pre-processing a featured snippet, followed by receiving the featured snippet with bullets, followed by the featured snippet reverting back to a standard snippet, only to jump back to a featured snippet without bullets, and as of now, it’s standard again.

As Gary Illyes said, there are many factors that determine when a featured snippet should be displayed. I understand that, but in this situation, it seems Google cannot make up its mind. I’ll keep monitoring the situation and update the post if anything changes (and if I learn something new).

Personally, I feel as if my post is in the gray area of featured snippets. It’s either that or some Halloween prank by Google. Maybe RankBrain can help. Muahahaha. :)

GG

 

 

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
16 Shares

Filed Under: google, seo

Connect with Glenn Gabe today!

Latest Blog Posts

  • Google’s December 2020 Broad Core Algorithm Update Part 2: Three Case Studies That Underscore The Complexity and Nuance of Broad Core Updates
  • Google’s December 2020 Broad Core Algorithm Update: Analysis, Observations, Tremors and Reversals, and More Key Points for Site Owners [Part 1 of 2]
  • Exit The Black Hole Of Web Story Tracking – How To Track User Progress In Web Stories Via Event Tracking In Google Analytics
  • Image Packs in Google Web Search – A reason you might be seeing high impressions and rankings in GSC but insanely low click-through rate (CTR)
  • Google’s “Found on the Web” Mobile SERP Feature – A Knowledge Graph and Carousel Frankenstein That’s Hard To Ignore
  • Image Migrations and Lost Signals – How long before images lose signals after a flawed url migration?
  • Web Stories Powered by AMP – 12 Tips and Recommendations For Creating Your First Story
  • Visualizing The SEO Engagement Trap – How To Use Behavior Flow In Google Analytics To View User Frustration [Case Study]
  • The May 2020 Google Core Update – 4 Case Studies That Emphasize The Complexity Of Broad Core Algorithm Updates
  • How To Remove An Image From Google Search Using The Outdated Content Tool (When The Image Was Published On Another Site)

Web Stories

  • Google’s Disqus Indexing Bug
  • Google’s New Page Experience Signal

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • GSQi Home
  • About Glenn Gabe
  • SEO Services
  • Blog
  • Contact GSQi
Copyright © 2021 G-Squared Interactive LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

The Internet Marketing Driver
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

This site also uses pixels from Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn so we publish content that reaches you on those social networks.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!